New Analysis:  Pfizer Vaccine Killed ‘About 40 Times More Elderly Than the Disease Itself Would Have Killed’

UPDATED 03/02/21   BIG PHARMA › NEWS  by Patrick Delaney

A re-analysis of data from the Israeli Health Ministry concluded Pfizer’s COVID vaccine killed “about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed” during a recent five-week vaccination period, and 260 times more younger people than would have died from the virus.

While in January a group of independent doctors concluded that experimental COVID-19 vaccines are “not safer” than the virus itself, a new analysis of vaccine-related death rates in Israel demonstrates that this may indeed be the case to dramatic levels.

A re-analysis of published data from the Israeli Health Ministry by Dr. Hervé Seligmann, a member of the faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases at Aix-Marseille University, and engineer Haim Yativ reveal, in short, that the mRNA experimental vaccine from Pfizer killed “about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed” during a recent five-week vaccination period. Among the younger class, these numbers are compounded to death rates at 260 times what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame.

While the full mathematical analysis may be found in the article itself, the authors demonstrate how among “those vaccinated and above 65, 0.2% … died during the three-week period between doses, hence about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated. This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination.”

“This scary picture also extends to those below 65,” the researchers continued. During the five-week vaccination process “0.05%, meaning 50 among 100,000, died. This is to be compared to the 0.19 per 100,000 dying from COVID-19 (who) are not vaccinated … Hence the death rate of this age group increased by 260 (times) during this five-week period of the vaccination process, as compared to their natural COVID-19 death rate.”

As reported by IsraelNationalNews (INN), Seligmann is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality, has a biology degree from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written more than 100 scientific publications. INN reports the researchers “have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.”

Yativ and Seligmann stipulate that even these “estimated numbers of deaths from the vaccine are probably much lower than actual numbers as it accounts only for those defined as COVID-19 deaths for that short time period and does not include AVC and cardiac (and other) events resulting from the inflammatory reactions.”

Nor do these numbers “account for long-term complications,” they write.

In addition, within several months they expect “mid- and long-term adverse effects of the vaccination as ADE (Antibody-dependent Enhancement)” begins to become manifest in those who have received the experimental Pfizer vaccine.

As explained by America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), ADE “is when anti-COVID antibodies, created by a vaccine, instead of protecting the person, cause a more severe or lethal disease when the person is later exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild. The vaccine amplifies the infection rather than preventing damage.”

AFLDS provides an example of a vaccine produced to fight the Dengue fever, which resulted in deaths of 600 children in the Philippines due to ADE, and the filing of criminal charges against the decision-makers in 2019.

For these reasons and more, AFLDS and many other doctors strongly discourage the use of these experimental vaccines for most people while only acknowledging that it may be plausible for those over 70 years of age, yet acknowledging that such injections are “a higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications” (sources here, here, here, and here).

Given these death rates, Yativ and Seligmann also have harsh criticism for the severe pressure being imposed upon the population by Israeli authorities to receive these shots. According to INN, the researchers call these draconian efforts “a new Holocaust.”

In the past weeks, Israel’s government made headlines when they adopted a “green pass” system, allowing people who have been injected to receive a green code, which then grants them entry into places such as entertainment and leisure facilities.

As the country reopens after a two-month lockdown, the green pass would be given only to those who had been injected, not to people who tested negative for the virus. The proposed benefits include access to “non-essential” businesses as well as not being required to self-isolate if identified as a close contact of a confirmed case of COVID-19, and not having to self-isolate after a return from what the government calls a “red location.”

Despite there being no proof that these experimental vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus, Israel’s minister for health, Yuli Edelstein, said upon the release of the vaccine “passport” that “(g)etting vaccinated is a moral duty. It is part of our mutual responsibility.” He went further, declaring, “Whoever does not get vaccinated will be left behind.”

The green pass needs renewing every six months, and despite holding one, an individual must still abide by masking and physical distancing rules. The Jerusalem Post also reported that legislation is being considered to grant employers the right to refuse unvaccinated people entry into the workplace.

Such measures prompted Business Insider to describe the country as “waging a war on the unvaccinated.” Meanwhile, Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, has styled Israel’s vaccination response as “extraordinarily good.”

Originally published by LifeSite News.

UPDATED: The headline and excerpt have been updated due to an error that improperly identified the authors of the re-analysis as the Israeli Health Ministry.

Recommend0 recommendationsPublished in Senior Chatters

Related Articles


  1. Alarming news elm, many thanks for bringing it to our attention. It is one of the possible outcomes of producing a vaccine in such a short time without the opportunity to thoroughly test it prior to administering. News of this type is bound to initiate a lot of ‘for and against’ debate, it will be interesting to follow it through to a definitive outcome. When you are hit with these ‘pros and cons’ situations, and your life may be potentially at stake, I prefer to keep an open mind until I have assessed both sides of the argument. The report seems to be specific to the mRNA vaccine, which is only one of several available and I can only imagine that plausible evaluation results will soon emerge. An adverse study by such eminent medical experts will almost immediately result in a re-evaluation and immediate dissemination of the findings to the general public. Your info should be food for thought for all rational people. Many thanks again for posting.

    1. @bob-deb,
      Here is my thoughts on this topic.
      Have recently been to my local GP skin check after having two stage one melanoma, “What is your view on the ‘jab’ Dr says (like DOC Martin) make and appointment! I will tell you what the Government want you to do, I will tell you what the Media want you to do, I will tell you what the Medical Boards want you to do and I will tell you what I think!!
      So I have tossed all these (pills) into a tumbler (my brain). At the moment they are still tumbling around, I have not made up my mind as yet, am old enough to remember vaccines rushed out to later on find bad results. With so much conflicting reports it is not easy. Luckily Australia has at the moment got off lightly.

      1. You have been left (unfairly I think) with a conundrum, the very antithesis of what is needed. Clarity and candour on behalf of all those who want to be judged as an authority on covid is what is needed. Uncertainty leads to hesitation which in turn results in loss of faith in the process. The matters raised by elm require a thorough evaluation and an open and candid reponse in order to restore the confidence of many of the general public. In the case of the many countries who are not using the mRNA vaccine we may feel isolated from the debate, but this is a global response to a global pandemic and all solutions must pass the ‘pub test’ globally.

  2. you need to research your info before spreading misinformation like this. does it not arouse your suspicions when a press release like this is released by a company which specialises in litigation on almost anything medical and tries to sell you insurance to claim against any medical person for nearly any perceived medical situation. People are dieing everyday from some virus or other and a vaccine helps people to try toprotect themselves. Or do you choose to ignore the benfits of people like jenner with his smallpox vaccine. when ignorant people spread rumours that having the vaccine made you prone to bovine diseases. Do you refuse penicilin or its derivatives if you are ill. i would hazard a guess that you would demand antibiotics if they saved your life.
    to quote a newspaper article from years ago ” world war two bomber found on the moon” perhaps you would think before you posted misleading claims.
    if you dont want the vaccine, thats your choice but please dont peddle unsubstantiated claims as if it is truth.
    just look at the figures dropping in the groups treated thusfarPS patrick delayney is on the payroll of the said insurance company

  3. I had a nasty reaction to my first covid inoculation. I have daily arthritic pain anyway but twenty four hours after the jab the joint pain was truly horrendous. I could hardly move or walk. Although it has now abated some weeks later I still don’t feel ‘right’. I seriously considered not having the second dose. However , bearing in mind the alternative isn’t a sensible option , I’ve reluctantly decided to go ahead. 

    1. I also had a lot of pain in my knee 24 hours after the jab – and  flu-like symptoms as did many of my friends I have spoken to but these side-effects diminished in a day and only a slight flu-like feeling lasted for a couple of days.  Small price to pay to rid us all of this terrible killer virus. 

    2. I was vaccinated (Pfizer)  2 nd dose a fortnight ago. No side effect. Everyone is different ! We are unique. Vaccination is the best way to get rid of the pandemic.
      We are so lucky to have vaccines.

  4. I agree with stargazer, don’t let this site become another false information host. Here in UK the media are always looking for ways to knock good news. None exists here on our media platform.

  5. Everyone has a different point of view regarding the vaccination programme. I was lucky enough to be involved in the testing last October. I was in a specific age group with a specific underlying condition. At the time I didn’t know if I had received the vaccine or a control vaccination. At the beginning of February I gave my last blood test to the trial. I didn’t die or have any symptoms apart from a stiff arm for 24 hours after the first dose and nothing after the second. Admittedly I recently found out it wasn’t the Pfizer vaccination. There are plenty of reliable FACT checkers available, Reuters, BBC etc. Over 21,000,000 first dose vaccinations given in the U.K and the death rate for all conditions is down for this time of year. Our death rate went up because the U.K thought Christmas dinner with others was more important than staying safe. Isolation works the vaccinations works. Human nature and ambulance chasers do not.

  6. The purpose of a blog is to invite comments. ‘Cancel culture’ has no place in my life. Vitriolic attacks are really not necessary.

  7. Covid passport! Another ‘stick’ to crush Palestinians? The only ‘holocaust’ being perpetrated is that of the Israel Government on the Palestinian people

    1. Strange that the politics forum never took of, when so many of the responses to this blog, and possibly the blog itself are overtly, possibly rabidly, political in nature.

      1. We could discuss the lies, obfuscation and conflation of both of England’s main political party’s or the fact that israel have ignored over 30 UN Resolutions whilst stealing more and more land not ceded by the Balfour Agreement

        1. We could, and so much more, but it does seem that most who would deign air a view on any subject, often think that the only acceptable position is the one to which they subscribe, which immediately obviates any opportunity to debate.

  8. My vaccination was with Pfizer and I’m upright, healthy and not a single side effect, other than the elephant trunk I grew. This site looked like a typical conspiracy site meant to spread fear that was recently suggested to be financed and pushed by DJ Trump love interest V. Putin and meant to scare people from taking vaccination so USA would be less healthy, more divided, and Russia can sell its vaccine around the world.

  9. New Brunswick Canada
    30 “virus” related deaths since last year in a population of 746,000. Mostly in long term care facilities.
    Around 30 deaths at one local funeral home this past month for a neighbouring population of about 50,000.
    It’s all about the flu and everyone else who has cancer, diabetes, heart troubles, mental illness, etc… is oblivious to mankind.
    Masks don’t work. Masks do work. Wear two masks. If I would say those 3 sentences a few weeks apart, I would be called a liar.
    Then you have the modeling. Probably the same AI that predicts the weather.
    Nobody is looking around them and analyzing what is going on. Because it would suggest taking your eyes off those slave screens that you hold in your hand, on your lap or that you watch in the livingroom.
    Since you’re still reading, hi, and have a good day/night!

Chat Rooms

Request Friendships from Our Latest Chatters
Add a photo to your profile to be shown in our latest Chattters gallery

Latest Chatters

Click the X to close your Dashboard.  To relaunch navigate away from the page you’re on before clicking the link again